Friday, October 28, 2011

Obama's Science Czar John Holdren and Ecoscience

Some rather interesting things are being alleged about John Holdren. Apparently he wrote a book called Ecoscience back in 1977. That book has some notions in it that make him sound like a Dr. Frankenstein type science czar.


In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;

• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;

• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.
More here

Quotes;
   Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock

ECOSCIENCE BOOK HERE

2 comments:

  1. Hello!

    I linked this article at my blog The Conservative Guild. Great stuff and worth a read! Thank you for posting this. It's easy to get caught up in the flavor of the week when talking about the human theater of "politics", but the killing of the unborn is always a relevant issue.

    Again, thank you for posting this. This matters.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We're talking 1977 here. Irrelevant. Cold war period. He's talking about strategies in a dystopia.

    This article is pure, biased propaganda.

    ReplyDelete